Stripper’s use of sex toy on best man ‘a joke’
Thursday, September 11th, 2008 | Sex Toys
A FEMALE stripper whispered into the ear of the best man at a Melbourne bucks night, “Don’t worry, only you and I know”, after she allegedly raped him in front of his cheering mates.
Stripper Linda Naggs also allegedly told the man — who cannot be identified for legal reasons — that she did not mean to penetrate him with a sex toy during her show and that it was “only a joke”.
Ms Naggs yesterday pleaded not guilty to one count of rape after being committed to stand trial, following the party at a rented bayside suburb house on September 23 last year. Documents tendered to the Melbourne Magistrates Court reveal the best man told police he felt violated and that his “manhood had dropped a bit” since the alleged rape.
The man said he took part in Ms Naggs’s strip show after his mates called his name and egged him on.
He told police Ms Naggs took his top off, pushed down his jeans and asked him to “get down on all fours” before she strapped on a dildo.
The best man said he asked Ms Naggs not to penetrate him and that the stripper replied, “Not a problem, relax, it’s only fun, I won’t go there”, but she did it anyway.
“I was shocked, then I heard her up close in my ear: ‘Don’t worry, only you and I know.’ I know she was referring to what had just happened,” he told police.
“I rolled to my side and I pushed her off and said, ‘What the f..k did you just do? … You said you weren’t going to do that and you did. You have just violated me.” Ms Naggs denied this to police, saying the best man had “pushed back” on to her during the alleged rape.
She said the man repeatedly demanded his money back.
“Then he hit me across the back of the head and my driver (minder) gave the money back,” Ms Naggs told police in her interview.
Defence lawyer Geoffrey Steward told the court the witness testimonies had inconsistencies, including the evidence given by the best man.
He said no jury in Victoria would find Ms Naggs guilty.
“This is an allegation that clearly arises from the most unusual circumstances … it’s an allegation that involves the time frame of about one second,” Mr Steward said.
“It is my submission that no jury could convict this woman on this count.”
Prosecutor Bill Stougiannos said there was strong evidence of sexual penetration and asked magistrate Elizabeth Lambden not to be influenced by the unusual circumstances.
Ms Lambden ordered Ms Naggs to stand trial in the Victorian County Court in July.
Read Story
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24322528-5006785,00.html